The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 207 “specifies strength requirements for automotive seats and their attachment assemblies, so as to minimize the possibility of their failure by forces acting on them as a result of vehicle impact.”
While this standard helps to regulate how well a seat structure performs in an accident, it has failed to significantly decrease injuries and fatalities due to seatback failure. Alyssa’s story is one of many such devastating tales…
The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 207 “specifies strength requirements for automotive seats and their attachment assemblies, so as to minimize the possibility of their failure by forces acting on them as a result of vehicle impact.”
While this standard helps to regulate how well a seat structure performs in an accident, it has failed to significantly decrease injuries and fatalities due to seatback failure. Alyssa’s story is one of many such devastating tales.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety lists 2006 as their most recent year of fatality statistics. There were 1,327 deaths caused by rear impact motor vehicle accidents. The majority of fatalities were under the age of 25, with crashes causing one of every three injury-related deaths among children under 13.
Of these numbers, it is unclear exactly how many death were a result of seatback failures, but what is clear is that auto crashes are a significant cause of life ending or altering injuries in children. What is tragic is the lack of governmental oversight, or seemingly interest, in how often seats fail with catastrophic results.
We have numerous reports on air bag related injuries, but no hard data on seat failures and the resulting injuries. A study for The Los Angeles Times by Keith Friedman, an auto safety researcher, analyzed 72 rear-end collisions using a government database of tow-away crashes, found that from 1988 to 1997 1,800 backseat passengers were injured or killed by seat failures.
What we need are more researchers willing to invest the time into this important subject. Data on which cars have a history of seat collapse and which ones are best known to withstand a rear impact needs to be better available to the public. This topic isn’t a new one – auto safety engineers have been issuing warnings on this subject since the 1950s.
The FMVSS 207 was adopted back in 1968 and other than adding vans, trucks and buses in 1972, there hasn’t been an update in its standards since. FMVSS 207 requires that a seat back be capable of handling an impact of 270 foot/lbs. Now compare that number to the 6,000 lbs. of force that seat belts are required to withstand before failure. Why would the seat only need to be four or five percent as strong as the seat belt?
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is well aware of the problem and in 1996 actually admitted that the current standard was inadequate…this didn’t lead to any changes, only further recognition of the problem in 1997 and 1998. One of the reasons they are dragging their heels is over the concern that stiffer seatbacks will lead to more incidents of whiplash.
Compare a whiplash injury with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) that leads to permanent disability or death – which one would you chose?
For now, research into the car you own or are looking to buy is the best offensive you can take to keep you and your passengers safe. One Website with some information, though not nearly enough regarding seat failures, is Safecar.gov. Until we see higher seatback safety standards, we will continue to hear of tragic stories such as Alyssa’s. We need to write to NHTSA, to our local government and to our automobile manufacturers. These issues need to be resolved for the safety of all vehicle occupants.